Where has Ballard WMA been productive?

Compare reported locations

293 accepted reported location observations match the area, label and date filters. 8 labels fall below the selected sample floors and are hidden from this comparison table only. Floors do not change the selection summary, date table or evidence rows; they do not establish statistical confidence.

Using all accepted source dates, which vary by WMA. Choose ‘Dates included for both WMAs’ to compare over a shared reporting-date subset.

When were the recorded results strongest?

Daily totals use only the selected source family and accepted observations. A location filter narrows these totals to that reported label; omitted dates are gaps.

Inspect the source observations

A reported 0/n is retained with n hunters. Dashes and blanks never enter arithmetic. Unknown blind species remain unknown. Each link points to the agency original, not a redistributed PDF.

What remains outside these comparisons?

This preview excludes 3,452 source location cells and 37 area rows for missing values, conflicting sources, weekday headers or special-hunt dates. Reasons overlap. These are not zero-harvest observations.

Bird scope is generic at location level; this is not a duck-only or statewide ranking. Weather associations, exact blind maps and additional seasons are not part of this release.

Review source hashes, methods, accepted coverage and withheld records. For current access and rules, use the Department’s waterfowl information.